Commissioner of Income Tax v. Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. 6483 / 2018
Petition dismissed in light of inconsistency of IBC with the Income Tax Act
Haravtar Singh Arora v. Navneet Gupta 5941 / 2018
Petition dismissed in light of inconsistency of IBC with the Income Tax Act
Pawan Mantri v. BMM Ispat Limited and Ors. 16558 / 2018
Disposal of admitted application, citing successful settlement, by exercise of powers under Art.142
Devendra Padamchand Jain v. State Bank of India 3592 / 2018
Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but expunged the adverse remarks made against the Resolution Professional
Ankit Metal and Power Limited v. Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Limited 2483 / 2018
Disposal of admitted application, citing successful settlement, by exercise of powers under Art.142
Anax Industries Private Limited v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Freight India Private Limited 5803 /...
Disposal of admitted application, citing successful settlement, by exercise of powers under Art.142
Gaurav Vinod Goel v. Inox Air Products Private Limited 865 / 2018
Disposal of admitted application, citing successful settlement, by exercise of powers under Art.142
Macquaire Bank Limited v. Shilpi Cable Technologies 15135 / 2017
Section 9 (3)(c) of the Code is only directory and Demand Notice issued by an Advocate is legally permissible
Impex Ferro Tech Limited v. Agarwal Coal Corporation Private Limited 33687 / 2017
Petition disposed of in lieu of settlement between the parties
Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd v. Hotel Gaudvan Pvt Ltd. 16929 / 2017
Arbitration Instituted after commencement of Moratorium is Non-Est in Law
Mobilox Innovations Pvt Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt Ltd. 9405 /2017
Plausible Contentions giving rise to further investigation qualifies as Dispute
Innoventive Industries Ltd. & ICICI Bank & Anr 8337-8338 / 2017
Repugnancy arises when the State Law interferes with operation of the Central Law
Neelkanth Township & Construction Pvt Ltd. v. Urban Infrastructure Trustees Ltd. 10711 / 2017
Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as there was no substance for appeal
Surendra Trading Company v. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited and Others 8400 /...
Compliance with Seven Day Time Period for Rectification of Defects is Directory and not Mandatory
Mothers Pride Dairy India Pvt. Ltd. v. Portrait Advertising and Marketing Pvt. Ltd. 9286...
Disposal of admitted application citing successful settlement by exercise of powers under Art.142
Lokhandwala Kataria Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Nisus Finance and Investment Managers LLP 9279/2017
Disposal of admitted application citing successful settlement by exercise of powers under Art.142
Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch v. Zenith Infotech Ltd. 3055 / 2017
“Scrutiny” power does not vest adjudicating powers on the BIFR
